Tag: Lifecycle stage: B4
7.5 Module B4 – Replacement
Written on .
7.5 Module B4 – Replacement
B-11 (Buildings) / B-06 (Products) Definition of the service life of a building product
Written on .
| Aspect | B-11 (Buildings) / B-06 (Products) Definition of the service life of a building product | |||||
| Description |
The lifespan, or service life, of building components and elements is usually defined as the period of time during which their performance meets or exceeds initial requirements. More detailed definitions can be found in reference work (e.g. the ISO 15686 series [ISO 15686] and [Guidance Paper F 2004] concerning the Construction Products Directive). Service life depends on many parameters, and is one subject of the ISO 15686 series. | |||||
|
Related study objective |
☒ stand-alone LCA | ☒ comparative assertion | ||||
|
related study phase |
☒ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
| goal and scope definition | inventory analysis (LCI) | impact assessment (LCIA) | interpretation | reporting | ||
|
relevant for |
||||||
| new buildings | existing buildings | construction products | screening LCA | simplified LCA | complete LCA | |
| Provisions |
The service life of a product or building component has an influence on several aspects of the use stage of building LCA:
The service life of a product or component is influenced by many parameters, notably the indoor and outdoor environments, maintenance level, design of the product, etc. (see ISO 15868-8 for further information). When providing information related to service life for an EPD, ISO 15804 requires that the intended use and in-use conditions of the product or system be specified and documented (EN 15804, Annex A). When developing LCA at the building scale on the basis of several EPDs, it should be verified that the declared service lives and in-use conditions are compatible with the specifics of the building (notably its location and maintenance scenarios). Only end of life related to loss of performance should be taken into account in the base-case scenario. End of life related to obsolescence (e.g. replacement of the product system by a newly developed or more efficient one before the end of life) may, however, be assessed in a complementary assessment. For more information on obsolescence please refer to ISO 15686-1 (Chapter 7). |
|||||
| Rules from: |
EN 15978: 7.4.4.1 General 8.3 Time related characteristics 8.6.3 Scenarios for maintenance, repair, replacement EN 15804: |
|||||
| Guidance |
The RSL could be based on empirical, probabilistic or statistical data, but should always take into account the intended use (description of use) as described in ISO 15686-1, -2, -7 and -8 [EN 15804, Annex A].RSL should be determined on the basis of:
It is expected that some service life data may be missing for the assessment at the building scale. In this case, several additional sources may be used to determine the service life of the product or system:
For building products, it may be useful to use conventional values for the respective product category (e.g. in a national context or within an EPD programme), if available. For example, the EOTA guide in Europe states some commonly agreed service lives:
Refer to the aspects ‘Distinction between Modules B2, B3, B4 and B5’ and B-14 ‘Replacement frequency’ for further guidance on how to interpret and use RSLs for product and building LCA. |
|||||
B-12 (Buildings) / B-07 (Products) Replacement frequency
Written on .
| Aspect | B-12 Replacement frequency | |||||
| Description |
The frequency of replacement is related to the reference study period and the reference service life of the component to be replaced. The ratio between them could lead to a partial number of replacements (e.g. where the reference study period is 30 years but the reference service life for a component is 20 years). Should replacement cycles be calculated as ‘whole-number/full number’ of replacements, or does it make sense to calculate ‘proportionate/partial’ cycles of replacement? | |||||
|
related study objective |
☒ stand-alone LCA | ☒ comparative assertion | ||||
|
related study phase |
☒ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
| goal and scope definition | inventory analysis (LCI) | impact assessment (LCIA) | interpretation | reporting | ||
|
relevant for |
||||||
| new buildings | existing buildings | construction products | screening LCA | simplified LCA | complete LCA | |
| Provisions |
As the baseline scenario, replacement cycles have to be calculated in whole numbers, according to EN 15978 and EN 15804 (examples are given there). Only whole numbers of replacements are allowed (no partial replacements). The number of replacements is related to the reference study period and the reference service life of the component to replace. The number of replacements must be rounded up unless justified.In order to show the effect of improved durability, a scenario with partial replacement cycles can be made. This scenario has to be documented and justified, and a sensitivity analysis conducted by comparison with the baseline scenario. | |||||
| Rules from: |
EN 15978: 8.6.4 Scenarios for refurbishment – Module B5 9.3.3 Replaceable components and number of replacements EN 15804: ILCD: |
|||||
| Guidance |
Partial replacement numbers should be avoided. Replacement numbers should be rounded up, unless justified as described below: The last replacement of components may be skipped, provided: – the component is not essential to security, health or comfort; – the absence of replacement is based on actual practice; – the final replacement occurs during the last 10% of the study period; – a specific maintenance scenario is developed in this case. This guidance needs to be applied homogeneously in comparisons. For example, for a study period of 50 years, in the case of an internal paint with a 15-year reference service life the last replacement could be ignored (i.e. two replacements rather than three). |
|||||
B-13 Replacement with screening LCA
Written on .
| Aspect | B-13 Replacement with screening LCA | |||||
| Description |
The replacement module covers the complete replacement of components and building parts if their reference service life is lower than the reference study period. Replacement is optional in the context of a screening LCA. | |||||
|
related study objective |
☒ stand-alone LCA | ☒ comparative assertion | ||||
|
related study phase |
☒ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
| goal and scope definition | inventory analysis (LCI) | impact assessment (LCIA) | interpretation | reporting | ||
|
relevant for |
||||||
| new buildings | existing buildings | construction products | screening LCA | simplified LCA | complete LCA | |
| Provisions |
Replacement is optional in the context of a screening LCA.The replacement procedure refers only to planned action in response to anticipated losses of performance of building components and building parts. Replacements should be considered when the reference service life (or eventual design life) of a product or building part is lower than the reference study period.The replacement scenario may cover some of the elements in the following list (item marked with a * are suggested):
Replacement of load-bearing structure, exterior and basement walls, floor slabs and foundation should not be considered unless justified, as they usually entail significant building modification. In any case, the boundaries of the maintenance scenario should be clearly stated. A replacement scenario at the building scale may be determined on the basis of:
Building modifications in response to unexpected events (e.g. flood, inappropriate use or vandalism) should be considered as reparation (B3), and are thus optional in the context of a screening LCA. According to EN 15978, the boundary for replacement should include:
However, in the context of a screening LCA, only the production of the replaced component need be included. The frequency of replacement may be determined according to the ‘replacement frequency’ aspect of the present guide. |
|||||
| Rules from: |
EN 15978: 7.4.4.1 General 7.4.4.5 Boundary for replacement (Module B4) 8.3 Time related characteristics 8.6.3 Scenarios for maintenance, repair, replacement EN 15804: |
|||||
| Guidance |
If possible, the overall replacement scenario should be consistent with respect to the building structure (e.g. replacement of coating is mandatory when replacing the support). In addition, LCA of an existing building should take into account actual and established practices (real-life data) specific to that particular building. | |||||
B-14 Replacement with simplified LCA
Written on .
| Aspect | B-14 Replacement with simplified LCA | |||||
| Description |
The replacement module covers the complete replacement of components and building parts if their reference service life is lower than the reference study period. Replacement is mandatory for a limited set of building parts and components in the context of a simplified LCA. | |||||
|
related study objective |
☒ stand-alone LCA | ☒ comparative assertion | ||||
|
related study phase |
☒ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
| goal and scope definition | inventory analysis (LCI) | impact assessment (LCIA) | interpretation | reporting | ||
|
relevant for |
||||||
| new buildings | existing buildings | construction products | screening LCA | simplified LCA | complete LCA | |
| Provisions |
The replacement procedure refers only to planned action in response to anticipated losses of performance of building components and building parts. Replacements should be considered when the reference service life (or eventual design life) of a product or building part is lower than the reference study period.The replacement scenario should cover at least the elements in the following list (item marked with a * are suggested):
The replacement of load-bearing structure, exterior and basement walls, floor slabs and foundation should not be considered unless justified, as it usually entails significant building modification. In any case the boundaries of the maintenance scenario should be clearly stated. A replacement scenario at the building scale should be determined on the basis of:
Building modifications in response to unexpected events (e.g. flood, inappropriate use or vandalism) should be considered as reparation (B3), and are thus optional in the context of a simplified LCA. According to EN 15978, the boundary for replacement should include:
However, in the context of a simplified LCA, only the production of the replaced component need be included. The frequency of replacement may be determined according to the ‘replacement frequency’ aspect of the present guide. |
|||||
| Rules from: |
EN 15978:7.4.4.1 General
7.4.4.5 Boundary for replacement (Module B4) 8.3 Time related characteristics 8.6.3 Scenarios for maintenance, repair, replacement EN 15804: 6.3.3. Reference service life 6.3.4.4.2 – B4 Replacement 7.3.3.1 B1–B5 use stage related to the building fabric Annex A |
|||||
| Guidance |
The overall replacement scenario should be consistent with respect to the building structure (e.g. replacement of coating is mandatory when replacing the support).In addition, LCA of an existing building should take into account actual and established practices (real-life data) specific to that particular building.As replacement scenarios are based on the RSLs of building components and building parts, it should be noted that the RSL could be based on empirical, probabilistic or statistical data, and should always taking into account the intended use (description of use) as described in ISO 15686-1, -2, -7 and -8 [EN 15804, Annex A]. Furthermore, a component manufacturer cannot be held responsible for the actual design of the building or the use and application of the product, environment, workmanship or use [EN 15804, Annex A].
Thus:
For an existing building, if a component has failed before its reference service life because of inappropriate maintenance, it may be considered as belonging to the repair module instead. |
|||||
B-15 Replacement with complete LCA
Written on .
| Aspect | B-15 Replacement with complete LCA | |||||
| Description |
The replacement module covers the complete replacement of components and building parts if their reference service life is lower than the reference study period. | |||||
|
related study objective |
☒ stand-alone LCA | ☒ comparative assertion | ||||
|
related study phase |
☒ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
| goal and scope definition | inventory analysis (LCI) | impact assessment (LCIA) | interpretation | reporting | ||
|
relevant for |
||||||
| new buildings | existing buildings | construction products | screening LCA | simplified LCA | complete LCA | |
| Provisions |
The replacement procedure refers only to planned action in response to anticipated losses of performance of building components and building parts. Replacements should be considered when the reference service life (or eventual design life) of a product or building part is lower than the reference study period.A replacement scenario at the building scale should be determined on the basis of:
Building modifications in response to unexpected events (e.g. flood, inappropriate use or vandalism) should be considered as reparation (B3). According to EN 15978, the boundary for replacement should include:
Water and energy usage related to the replacement process should always be included. The frequency of replacement should be determined according to the ‘replacement frequency’ aspect of the present guide. |
|||||
| Rules from: |
EN 15978: 7.4.4.1 General 7.4.4.5 Boundary for replacement (Module B4) 8.3 Time related characteristics 8.6.3 Scenarios for maintenance, repair, replacement EN 15804: 6.3.3. Reference service life 6.3.4.4.2 – B4 Replacement 7.3.3.1 B1–B5 use stage related to the building fabric Annex A |
|||||
| Guidance |
The overall replacement scenario should be consistent with respect to the building structure (e.g. replacement of coating is mandatory when replacing the support). In addition, LCA of existing building should take into account actual and established practices (real-life data) specific to that particular building.As replacement scenarios are based on the RSLs of building components and building parts, it should be noted that the RSL could be based on empirical, probabilistic or statistical data, and should always taking into account the intended use (description of use) as described in ISO 15686-1, -2, -7 and -8 [EN 15804, Annex A]. Furthermore, a component manufacturer cannot be held responsible for the actual design of the building or the use and application of the product, environment, workmanship or use[EN 15804, Annex A].Thus:
For an existing building, if a component has failed before its reference service life because of inappropriate maintenance, it may be considered as belonging to the repair module instead For a new building, replacement frequency and more generally the replacement scenario should be based on service life planning and service life prediction, as described by ISO 15686 series [ISO 15686]. It should be noted that: service life planning can only address foreseeable changes. Since service life planning is concerned with foreseeable risks, it is not applicable to the estimation of obsolescence […] or to defective performance resulting from unforeseeable events or processes [ISO 15686-1, part B.8.2.]. Both cases may be accounted for in the case of existing buildings whenever specific data are available. The progressive loss of performance of some components has an impact on the overall behaviour of the building (e.g. loss of performance of insulation may lead to an increase of energy demand due to heating). If sufficient data are available these aspects should be addressed by using a sensitivity analysis. |
|||||
B- 17. “Inclusion of energy and materials for replacement”
Written on .
| Aspect | B- 17. “Inclusion of energy and materials for replacement” | |||||
| Description |
The inclusion of energy and water use, material use, etc. is framed by standards EN 15804 and EN 15978. EEB guide provides additional information and guidance on how (and when) to include or exclude a given aspect of the study. | |||||
|
related study objective |
☒ stand-alone LCA | ☒ comparative assertion | ||||
|
related study phase |
☒ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
| goal and scope definition | inventory analysis (LCI) | impact assessment (LCIA) | interpretation | reporting | ||
|
relevant for |
||||||
| new buildings | existing buildings | construction products | screening LCA | simplified LCA | complete LCA | |
| Provisions |
In the context of simplified LCA, the following items may be neglected upon justification:
In the context of screening LCA, only the production of the replaced component may be included. Please refer to the aspects “Replacement with complete LCA”, “Replacement with simplified LCA” and “Replacement with screening LCA” for further details. |
|||||
| Rules from: |
EN 15978:7.4.4.1 General7.4.4.5 Boundary for replacement (module B4)8.3 Time related characteristics
8.6.3 Scenarios for maintenance, repair, replacement EN 15804: 6.3.3. Reference service life 6.3.4.4.2 – B4 Replacement 7.3.3.1 B1-B5 use stage related to the building fabric |
|||||
| Guidance |
Please refer to the aspects “Replacement with complete LCA”, “Replacement with simplified LCA” and “Replacement with screening LCA” for further details. | |||||
Back to 5.5. Module B4