Skip to main content

Important Change to Your Generis Licensing Model Effective 01 August 2026

Effective 01 August 2026, we will be changing the operator of the Generis platform. The booking and payment process for your Generis licenses will in future be handled entirely by LZE GmbH. This transition enables professional customer support and payment processing through LZE GmbH, while allowing us at Fraunhofer to focus on content updates and further development for you.

As part of this transition, we will also be adjusting our license structure in Generis. In the future, the Single and Floating Single license types will differ only in the number of users. The Single license will thus include significantly more features than before.

New features in the Single license:

  • Migration of projects / database upgrade
  • Generis expert analysis
  • Use of custom Excel reporting templates
  • The team functionality will continue to remain exclusive to the Floating Single license.

Additionally, in the coming weeks we will be introducing a new dashboard that provides you with a clear overview and analysis of your projects directly within the software interface.

New annual prices effective 01 August 2026:

  • Single license: €1,950 per year
  • Floating Single license: €4,200 per year

Your current licenses are not affected by this price change — it will only take effect once you purchase a new license.

We look forward to providing you with the Generis platform through our partner LZE GmbH in the future. If you have any questions about your subscription or the operator change, please do not hesitate to contact us!

Changeover of end-of-life evaluation for DGNB certification

Dear Generis users,

in the future, the DGNB will require the separation of life cycle modules C and D for the DGNB-relevant indicators as part of the certification process. The modules C3 and C4 – for the DGNB relevant indicators – should still be combined. Generis is also affected by this change by providing the evaluation templates for DGNB certification.

Currently, there is a transition period that is not defined more precisely, during which the old evaluation with aggregated module C and D will also be accepted. You can therefore still use the existing templates for submission for the time being, and these will also still be accepted. If you receive any other feedback from the DGNB in this regard, please refer to the agreement between the Generis development team of the Fraunhofer IBP and the DGNB.

We are already working on the new templates and will inform you again as soon as they are available.

Picture: © image4you/pixabay

GENERIS® online seminar 2021

The use of product- or manufacturer-specific data sets can be advantageous in the certification process. In addition to the – mainly generic – data sets of Ökobaudat, environmental product declarations can also be used in Generis. How environmental product declarations are created, where they can be found and how they can be used in Generis is described in this year’s online seminar.

The use phase also plays a crucial role in the balancing of buildings, so we will also take a look at the mapping of photovoltaic systems and show what special features need to be considered when balancing heat pumps.

The online seminar will take place on Thursday, 16 December at 15:00 and will last about 45 minutes. Users with the “Single” level or higher have already received the participation link in a separate e-mail.

We look forward to your participation.

GENERIS® is here!

After the development we can now present GENERIS®, the successor of SBS Building Sustainability. The user interface has been made simpler and more intuitive, and the structures and databases have also been revised in the background. This enables new operating elements, such as a direct search function during design creation and other extensive functionalities. We will continue to develop additional functions and provide the latest versions of ÖKOBAUDAT and user profiles of the certification systems DGNB, BNB and BREEAM.

All user accounts and projects from sbs-onlinetool.com have been backed up and can be migrated to GENERIS® upon request. Please contact kontakt@generis-solution.eu for this purpose.

Along with the relaunch, we are introducing a four-tier licensing model (see https://generis-solution.eu/produkte/ ). GENERIS® can still be used with the core functions and a standard evaluation scheme without any restrictions. Depending on the level, paying users receive extended evaluation schemes (for example DGNB, BNB or BREEAM), extended support and access to the research network. More information is available on this homepage.

IMPORTANT NOTICE:

The https://www.sbs-onlinetool.com/ and https://www.gabi3.com/ websites will be permanently offline after a transition period. Please use this link to GENERIS® in the future.

1.1 Energy-efficient buildings in Europe

In the last 20 years energy efficiency has become an increasingly important aspect of the planning and evaluation of buildings, as well as a subject of legislation within the EU. As a result, the operational energy consumption of new and refurbished buildings has decreased considerably during this time. Figure 1 shows the ratio between the operational energy (for regulated uses such heating, ventilation, cooling and lighting according to the EPBD) during the use phase, and the embodied energy due to the fabrication of the building products as well as their end of life (EoL). The use phase for the older buildings dominates all other life cycle stages. Today, new buildings may consume less than 15 kWh final energy for heating per m² per year if they complying with the Passivhaus standard. The new types of ‘energy surplus’ or ‘positive energy’ building may even be net producers of energy. Therefore the ratio between operational impacts (the use phase) and the embodied impacts (e.g. for production and EoL) is now more or less balanced (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Ratio of use phase to production/EoL for a 10–20 year old building compared with a newly built Passivhaus

 

These changes emphasize that as well as optimizing the use phase of a building it is also important to consider the embodied impacts of the materials used in its construction. As a result, the Energy-Efficient Buildings Initiative now needs to consider a life cycle perspective ‘from cradle to grave’, with energy consumption being only one environmental aspect within a multicriteria framework that includes, for example, waste generation and climate change.

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the method used to address the environmental impacts of products and buildings. It models a product’s technical life cycle, documenting energy and material flows entering or leaving the product system, and assessing the associated environmental burdens.

LCA has been defined as a generally applicable method in [ISO 14040] and [ISO 14044]. Extensive documentation on LCA is given in the ILCD Handbook [ILCD 2011a, 2011b, 2010c]. More specific definitions on how to use LCA in the construction industry are given in [EN 15804] and [EN 15978]. This document provides guidance on how to conduct LCA studies of construction products and buildings, and how to apply the available standards and other rules.

 


1     Introduction

1.2.1 Goal of this guidance

This guidance document – the EeBGuide – provides information on calculation rules, metrics, provisions and instructions for LCA studies of energy-efficient buildings and building products for European research projects of the E2B Initiative. The core objective is to give pragmatic and relevant guidance to LCA practitioners and construction experts on how to move forward in the field of LCA towards comparative, meaningful study results, both within individual studies and between them.

This document is the outcome of the European research project ‘EeBGuide – Operational guidance for Life Cycle Assessment Studies of the Energy-Efficient Buildings Initiative’, which ran from November 2011 to October 2012. The project was co-funded as a coordination and support action (CSA) by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme, contract no. 285490. The project was coordinated by the Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics Sustainable Construction Group (Germany). Other members of the consortium were PE International AG (Germany), Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment (France), Escola Superior de Comerç International (Spain), BRE Global Ltd (UK) and Prof Ch Sjöström Consultancy (Sweden). As members of the review panel, Friderik Knéz and Dr Wolfram Trinius contributed to the development of the document, as well.

LCA studies are generally conducted for one specific scope. Within the construction sector, such a scope typically refers to construction products or to buildings, particularly in the field of research for energy-efficient buildings. In order to simplify access to relevant guidance of for practitioners, the EeBGuide project yielded two separate documents: one for building products, and one for buildings. Some elements are common to the two documents, but others differ, owing to the different scope.


1     Introduction

1.2.2 Scope of this guidance

This guidance is focused on LCA studies of buildings and building products within the framework of the Energy-Efficient Building European Initiative (E2B EI), which creates technologies for an energy-efficient Europe. LCA assesses the environmental loads and performance of these new products and technologies, demonstrated mainly within building applications. LCA is used within European research projects on matters of energy efficiency in the construction sector that are managed under the E2B EI umbrella. The main aim of this guidance is to provide rules and instructions on how to conduct LCA studies consistently within such research projects.

A variety of questions, aspects and topics often arise during such an LCA study, but the answers in the literature and standards are often not coherent, or sufficiently extensive. The key objective of this guide is therefore to provide information on definitions, calculation rules, assumptions and comparative results of LCA studies for energy-efficient buildings and building products with regard to such aspects.

The guidance is based on existing ISO standards on LCA [ISO 14040-44], European standards [EN 15804] and [EN 15978] with regard to LCA, and other reference documents [ILCD 2010a], [ILCD 2010b], [ILCD 2010c], as well as on current discussion topics within the LCA construction community. It brings this information together in one comprehensive guide. It also clarifies aspects that are not totally consistent or may even be contradictory in the various LCA-related standards and reference documents, as well as those aspects that are generally not specified.

There are two main approaches to LCA studies: attributional and consequential. Attributional LCA studies generally do not investigate the potential consequences of a product system for the background system or for other systems (the ILCD Handbook denotes this as decision context situation A). By contrast, consequential LCA studies do investigate those consequences (decision context situation B in the ILCD Handbook). In section G-02, guidance is given on how to identify the decision context of a study. In general, this guidance document is limited to the case of attributional LCA studies. This is consistent with CEN standards EN 15804 and EN 15978, which are limited solely to this case.

For consequential LCA studies, various scientific aspects are yet to be clarified, and a broad scientific consensus on the different aspects is yet to be reached. If a practitioner identifies the need to conduct a consequential LCA study, guidance can be found in the literature and in the ILCD Handbook.


1     Introduction

1.2.3 Primary audience for EeBGuide

The EeBGuide is oriented mainly at LCA practitioners and/or building LCA tool developers. It is not an introduction for novice LCA users, as it assumes a basic knowledge of the standards [ISO 14040], [ISO 14044], the ILCD Handbook, and EN 15978 and EN 15804, as well as practical experience, although detailed knowledge of these is not required. However, it is assumed that the reader using this document has access to these sources (especially the ISO and CEN standards) as they are referred to, and need to be consulted in detail for some items.

The principal audience for this document is the LCA practitioner who is required to deliver an LCA study within a European research project, particularly those that fall under the EeB PPP framework (see 1.3.3). For this audience, the document contains the rules and guidance to produce the study in a generally agreed and consistent way. The goal of projects of the EeB PPP framework is to “deliver, implement and optimize building and district concepts that have the technical, economic and societal potential to drastically decrease energy consumption and reduce CO2 emissions in both new and existing buildings across the European Union”. LCA plays a large role as a measuring instrument in these projects, but the main focus clearly lies on technical innovations. The target audience of the project outcomes is mainly researchers, companies, designers and consultants in the field of construction.


1     Introduction

1.2.4 Secondary audience for EeBGuide.

Die sekundäre Zielgruppe umfasst Ökobilanz-Praktiker, die eine praxisnahe und wissenschaftlich fundierte Anleitung suchen, um eine Ökobilanzstudie zu erstellen, die soweit wie möglich sowohl mit den europäischen Normen zur Umweltleistung von Gebäuden (EN 15804 und EN 15978) als auch mit dem ILCD-Handbuch übereinstimmt. Eine weitere sekundäre Zielgruppe sind Entwickler von Ökobilanz-Software für Gebäude. Sie können die Bestimmungen und Anleitungen des EeBGuide als Richtlinien für die Auswahl konsistenter Daten, Methoden, Referenz- oder Standardwerte gemäß den verschiedenen Studientypen bei der Entwicklung oder Aktualisierung ihrer Ökobilanz-Software für Gebäude verwenden.

Eine weitere sekundäre Zielgruppe sind Experten, die für die Definition von Berechnungsregeln für Gebäudebewertungssysteme sowie für nationale oder europäische EPD-Programme verantwortlich sind. Für diese Personen bietet der EeBGuide allgemein anerkannte Berechnungsmethoden, die sich durch eine gute Konsistenz mit bestehenden Ansätzen und eine allgemeine Übereinstimmung unter europäischen Interessengruppen hinsichtlich der Berechnungsmethode auszeichnen. Die Verwendung des EeBGuide als Grundlage für die Entwicklung neuer EPD- oder Gebäudebewertungsprogramme oder für die Überarbeitung bestehender Programme wird die Gesamtkonsistenz der Anwendung der Ökobilanzierung im Kontext der europäischen Bauindustrie verbessern, was sicherlich ein zentrales Anliegen vieler Interessengruppen ist.

Im Falle der sekundären Zielgruppe werden ebenfalls Grundkenntnisse und Erfahrungen in der Ökobilanzmethodik und den entsprechenden Normen vorausgesetzt.


1 Einleitung

1.3.1 Previous European projects on LCA of buildings

Several European projects dealing with LCA and buildings have been conducted over the past few years. Most of them were aimed at adapting the methodological rules for LCA studies in the construction sector and enabling the development of user-friendly tools that can be used by building stakeholders, who are usually not LCA experts. These projects included, for example, REGENER, Annex 31 IEA, PRESCO, IMPRO-Building, ENSLIC Building and LoRe-LCA.

Two previous projects conducted under the Seventh Framework Programme (ENSLIC-Building and LoRe-LCA) may be seen as closely connected with the goals and scope of the EeBGuide project. These two projects have helped to define LCA methodology for the construction sector, and have identified needs for further research. Below are presented the citations from the projects’ websites.

“The ENSLIC project (ENergy Saving through promotion of Life Cycle assessment in buildings) promotes the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques in design for new buildings and for refurbishment, in order to achieve an energy saving in the construction and operation of buildings. This action draw on the existing information generated from previous research projects regarding: design for low energy consumption, integrated planning, environmental performance evaluation of buildings, design for sustainability and LCA techniques applied to buildings. The output – compiled with the collaboration of key target groups – is a set of guidelines with a methodology which clarifies the various aspects of the LCA, e.g. purpose, benefits, requirements, flexibility and different techniques. This is applied to real buildings by a number of collaborating target groups. The results are disseminated to a wide target group through multiple channels and the potential for energy saving highlighted. Through this project tools for use in an integral planning process are being promoted to stakeholders who require a means to optimize environmental performance of buildings in a truly sustainable way.” [ENSLIC 2011]

“LoRe-LCA (“Low Resource consumption buildings and constructions by use of LCA in design and decision making”) aims to coordinate activities regarding the application of LCA in the European construction sector, focusing on comparing and improving the functional units used for LCA for whole buildings, improving the possibilities to compare results for different alternatives during design stage, and for comparison of results for different buildings. The project focuses on harmonisation and use of LCA-methods in design and decision-making for reaching overall goals of reduced resource consumption.” [LoRe-LCA 2011]

Another interesting initiative covering European countries and some others is the Sustainable Building Alliance (SBA). Officially created in 2008, the SBA is a collaboration between international research institutes, certification bodies and other actors in the building industry. The main research action of SBA aims at answering the need of the real estate and construction industry for the development and application of harmonized common metrics for assessing building performance, to be implemented in existing certification schemes. A draft Framework for Common Metrics was elaborated in 2009 and 2010 by a core group of SBA members. It covered six main impacts, which included four environmental indicators based on LCA methodology: these deal with energy, water, greenhouse gases (GHG) and waste. The next step was to ensure the operational feasibility and comparability of LCA results for buildings, especially in terms of calculation rules, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) databases, life cycle stages and considered contributors (i.e. all the factors that are considered in an LCA). This was done in 2011, when the availability and maturity of methods, data and tools were studied. The SBA Common Metrics Framework was pilot-tested on real buildings to analyse its applicability, and possible future integration into existing certification rating schemes. This work has involved seven research and certification bodies in five European countries and in the USA. The working group highlighted the fact that the availability of homogeneous EPDs in each country is a crucial issue. The comparability of LCA environmental indicators is being tested in 2012 through a modelling study in each country, based on a single building design.

In these previous projects, no comprehensive guidance was given in a structured way according to the LCA steps as defined in ISO 14040 and the life cycle stages of the new European standards from CEN TC 350.


1     Introduction